| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump in 7.4 |
| Date: | 2002-11-14 05:47:16 |
| Message-ID: | 874raku2hn.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Won't work for functions that build dynamic queries.
Granted, but the the intent is to
(a) solve some, but not necessarily all, of the dump-order
problems
(b) drop functions that depend on a database object when the
database object itself is dropped -- i.e. you don't *want*
to worry about dynamically built queries, as they are fine
already
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-11-14 05:50:58 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-14 05:46:55 | Re: RC1? |