Re: pg_dump and pgpool

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump and pgpool
Date: 2004-12-30 05:12:39
Message-ID: 874qi49xo8.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:

> What's happening is that there are two databases behind pgpool, and each
> has managed to assign a different (set of) OID(s) to the table(s). So,
> when pg_dump asks for an OID, it gets two different ones.

If pgpool is so good at maintaining consistency between databases how did they
end up with different OIDs?

It seems you really do have inconsistent databases and are asking for pg_dump
to be robust against that. If the databases really are inconsistent isn't the
correct behaviour to cause precisely this error? Wouldn't hiding the
inconsistency only be doing you a disservice?

I think you should be trying to figure out why the databases are inconsistent
and working to figure out what you have to change to avoid whatever actions
caused that.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2004-12-30 14:07:33 Re: pg_dump and pgpool
Previous Message Horst G. Reiterer 2004-12-30 05:11:04 Roadmap for Database Kernel XA Support