From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: Snapshot cloning |
Date: | 2007-01-26 13:06:52 |
Message-ID: | 874pqeaqdv.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> backend1: select publish_snapshot(); -- will block
>
> backend2: start transaction;
> backend2: set transaction isolation level serializable;
> backend2: select clone_snapshot(<pid>); -- will unblock backend1
It seems simpler to have a current_snapshot() function that returns an bytea
or a new snapshot data type which set_current_snapshot(bytea) took to change
your snapshot. Then you could use tables or out-of-band communication to pass
around your snapshots however you please.
set_current_snapshot() would have to sanity check that the xmin of the new
snapshot isn't older than the current globaloldestxmin.
That could be handy for debugging purposes too.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2007-01-26 13:11:23 | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-26 12:25:47 | Re: Proposal: Snapshot cloning |