| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent psql API |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 14:46:10 |
| Message-ID: | 874pa9vkct.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> So, Greg, after all this feedback, are you going to rework the patch?
I'm a bit busy now but yes, eventually.
I had in mind that it would probably make sense to start over, stealing code
as appropriate. The main thing is that the logic is a bit twisted now since I
originally had it as a prefix command you gave before issuing the sql. As a
postfix command, \g&, the logic could be a bit simpler.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-10 14:47:59 | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-10 14:45:25 | Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-04-10 14:53:28 | Re: MSVC build broken with perl 5.10 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-10 14:43:01 | Re: Fix for win32 stat() problems |