| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: actualised funcs typmod patch |
| Date: | 2009-11-17 11:00:14 |
| Message-ID: | 874ooto1q9.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am sending actualised patch.
I've volunteered to review this patch, and before getting to read code
and documentation, then to test it, I have some more general question.
The idea to add support for typmods in function signatures came from the
need to have more than one anyelement at a time in a function, and Pavel
proposed that we spell that anyelement(0) and anyelement(1) e.g.
Is that how we want to solve it?
Now, whatever the answer to that is, I guess the patch still has
interest in itself for being able to have a function f(x numeric(10,4))
for example. Right?
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-11-17 11:41:14 | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2009-11-17 10:54:46 | Re: Writeable CTE patch |