Re: psql -e

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql -e
Date: 2003-07-28 13:36:31
Message-ID: 8748.1059399391@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Hmm, a little late here, but why not just unbuffer stdout, or are there
> reasons to preserve some buffering?

Performance. Unbuffered I/O is expensive, and not attractive in situations
where an fflush or two will solve the problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: psql -e at 2003-07-28 12:53:48 from Martijn van Oosterhout

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message nolan 2003-07-28 13:46:50 Re: psql -e
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-07-28 12:53:48 Re: psql -e