Re: Bitmap scan seem like such a strange choice when "limit 1"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Klaudie Willis <Klaudie(dot)Willis(at)protonmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bitmap scan seem like such a strange choice when "limit 1"
Date: 2020-09-04 14:41:21
Message-ID: 874451.1599230481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Klaudie Willis <Klaudie(dot)Willis(at)protonmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'd like to add, that when I do the same query DIRECTLY on the bigtable_y2020 (instead of the partition parent) it does change to "index scan" again.

Yeah. I think the issue here is that add_paths_to_append_rel only
considers cheapest-total paths for the member relations. Seeing
that it's already considering a slightly ridiculous number of
parallelization options, I'm hesitant to throw in cheapest-startup
considerations as well, for fear of blowing out planning time.

Maybe the right way to improve this is to bypass add_paths_to_append_rel
entirely when there's exactly one surviving child rel, and make it
just use all the surviving paths for that child.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2020-09-04 14:46:03 Re: Check for duplicates before inserting new rows
Previous Message Rich Shepard 2020-09-04 14:40:00 Re: Check for duplicates before inserting new rows