| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <VMIKHEEV(at)sectordata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'Bill Gribble'" <grib(at)linuxdevel(dot)com>, Greg Patnude <GPatnude(at)adelphia(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Database replication... - Mission Critica |
| Date: | 2002-11-07 15:09:44 |
| Message-ID: | 873cqdh0w7.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Mikheev, Vadim" <VMIKHEEV(at)sectordata(dot)com> writes:
> > My presumption would be that if you initialize 2 databases to
> > a known identical start, have all the same triggers and rules
> > on both, then send all queries to both databases, you will
> > have 2 identical databases at the end.
>
> This is wrong assumption.
Agreed. Another simple example is:
INSERT INTO foo VALUES (random());
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-07 15:18:15 | Re: licenses & price? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-07 15:05:28 | Re: Failed to initialize lc_messages 7.3b5 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-11-07 15:12:27 | Re: command |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-07 15:05:28 | Re: Failed to initialize lc_messages 7.3b5 |