From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Backup file extension |
Date: | 2006-02-25 03:41:45 |
Message-ID: | 873bi8ksue.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, michaelmschmidt(at)msn(dot)com ("Michael Schmidt") belched out:
> I am writing a client GUI application and am adding backup/restore
> features. I noticed that different backup file extensions are used
> for PostgreSQL - pgAdmin uses .backup (possible problem because it
> is not consistent with 8.3 file names) and PG Lightning Admin uses
> .bak (possible problem because it is generic). To reduce the chance
> of the user making an error, I was wondering if it would make sense
> to standardize PostgreSQL backup file extension names - something
> like .pgb (PostgreSQL Backup). I Googled pgb and it doesn't look
> like anything uses this extension.
Well, Unix doesn't have any notion of "extensions." That's something
for legacy operating systems, like MVS, CP/M, MS/DOS, and such.
On modern OSes, they generally simply support having long names, and
you are free to use whatever prefix/suffix combinations you prefer.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="gmail.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/rdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #128. "I will not employ robots as agents
of destruction if there is any possible way that they can be
re-programmed or if their battery packs are externally mounted and
easily removable." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-02-25 03:42:43 | Re: phantom backends |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-02-25 03:38:23 | Re: psql is very slow |