Re: Changing the result of ExecutorRun

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> * Return the count of tuples processed, probably as a long since that's
> what the input limit-count is. There are potential overflow issues with
> this definition on 32-bit machines, though that's not going to affect
> functions.c since it passes a limit of 1 tuple in the cases where it
> needs to examine the result, and no one else presently cares at all.
> But the possibility of overflow might limit the usefulness of this
> definition in other scenarios.

And what would that mean for a cursor which was read forward and backward?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!