From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Calling for a replacement committer for GROUPING SETS |
Date: | 2015-03-09 20:26:54 |
Message-ID: | 87385eugga.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I'm now requesting that some other committer take on the grouping
>> sets patch. Any takers?
Tom> FWIW, "slacking" doesn't mean "I've abandoned Postgres work
Tom> completely".
I had taken your name off the patch in the CF and was planning to post
this request even before I saw rhaas' post, much less your response.
It's been almost six months since you claimed the patch, and three
months since you said you would "look into" the question of the
CTE-based approach per our discussion in December. So frankly I don't
feel confident in your "expect ... before too long" ;-)
So my request stands. I'll work with whoever gets to it first.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-09 20:46:28 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-03-09 20:15:59 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |