From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Damir Ciganović-Janković <damir(dot)ciganovic(dot)jankovic(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15334: Partition elimination not working as expected when using enum as partition key |
Date: | 2018-08-20 06:06:19 |
Message-ID: | 8736v938jq.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
>>>>> "Amit" == Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
Amit> Andrew also mentioned a workaround in his reply to use setString
Amit> such that JDBC doesn't pass 'MONTH' as of type 'text' and instead
Amit> as of unknown type. I could't find the documentation of Postgres
Amit> JDBC's setString to see how one can do that, but maybe you can
Amit> try it out.
Disclaimer: I don't do java stuff myself, all I know about this is from
reading the code.
First, there's a connection parameter stringtype=unspecified that
affects all setString calls on the connection. Second, there may be a
way to use setObject instead; setObject(1, str, Types.DISTINCT) looks
like it might work (or maybe Types.OTHER) - unless I'm completely
misreading the pgjdbc code, that should end up sending the right thing
to the server.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Damir Ciganović-Janković | 2018-08-20 07:38:21 | Re: BUG #15334: Partition elimination not working as expected when using enum as partition key |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2018-08-20 06:00:31 | BUG #15341: postgresql is not running |