Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

Tom> Hm. transformRuleStmt already does special-case utility statements
Tom> to some extent, so my inclination would be to make it do more of
Tom> that. However, it looks like that might end up with rather
Tom> spaghetti-ish code, as that function is kind of messy already.

Tom> Or we could abandon the notion of adding the assertion. I don't
Tom> know how much work it's worth.

Fixing transformRuleStmt just pushes the issue along another step:
InsertRule wants to do recordDependencyOnExpr on the rule actions,
which just does find_expr_references_walker.

I'm going to leave the assertion out for now and put in a comment for
future reference.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)