From: | Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FILLFACTOR and increasing index |
Date: | 2011-05-10 09:41:10 |
Message-ID: | 873165.76105.qm@web29002.mail.ird.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Yes, I use the same approach, but I'm not aware of any such guideline
> related to fillfactor with indexes. Anyway those guidelines need to be
> written by someone, so you have a great opportunity ;-)
I did a quick test using your example. As in your test, "increasing"
values don't get any gain from a different fillfactor.
I tried a random index:
create table test_fill (id int);
create index test_fill_idx on test_fill(id) with (fillfactor=100);
insert into test_fill select (random()*100000)::integer from
generate_series(1,10000000) i;
time: 373936.724
drop table test_fill;
create table test_fill (id int);
create index test_fill_idx on test_fill(id) with (fillfactor=50);
insert into test_fill select (random()*100000)::integer from
generate_series(1,10000000) i;
time: 393209.911
not much difference...
Now I'm getting confused... is which cases fillfactor makes a difference???
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tv | 2011-05-10 09:57:17 | Re: FILLFACTOR and increasing index |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-05-10 04:02:19 | Re: "interval hour to minute" or "interval day to minute" |