From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication Syatem |
Date: | 2008-04-29 14:16:02 |
Message-ID: | 873.1209478562@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> The model here assumes that you'll need that space again for the next time
> you UPDATE or INSERT a row. So instead VACUUM just keeps those available
> for database reuse rather than returning it to the operating system.
> Now, if you don't VACUUM frequently enough, this model breaks down, and
> the table can get bigger with space that may never get reused. The idea
> is that you should be VACUUMing up now unneeded rows at about the same
> rate they're being re-used. When you don't keep up, the database can
> expand in space that you don't get back again. The right answer to this
> problem is not to use VACUUM FULL; it's to use regular VACUUM more often.
Also, you need to make sure you have the FSM parameters set high enough
so that all the free space found by a VACUUM run can be remembered.
The less often you run VACUUM, the more FSM space you need, because
there'll be more free space reclaimed per run.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-29 14:20:48 | Re: Where do a novice do to make it run faster? |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-29 13:48:31 | Re: Replication Syatem |