| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement |
| Date: | 2017-04-10 16:04:05 |
| Message-ID: | 872CA281-30A1-4CA6-9C3E-BBCA081ADA87@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 10 Apr 2017, at 16:42, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/8/17 04:50, Michael Banck wrote:
>> "Client-Side Connection-Failover"
>
> I don't think the libpq feature can be considered "failover". It just
> picks from a list of end points on the initial connection attempt. It
> does not discover connection failures and reconnect.
Yeah, after reading Roberts blog post, I'd also agree that "failover"
is a bad/misleading (in the "automatic" sense) description for it.
+ Justin
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2017-04-10 18:10:11 | Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-10 15:42:34 | Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement |