Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-23 22:39:23
Message-ID: 8727.1298500763@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Marko Tiikkaja's message of sb ene 15 17:30:14 -0300 2011:
>> On 2010-10-21 3:32 PM +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> <patch>
>>
>> Here's the patch rebased against the master. No code changes since the
>> last patch I sent.

> Having a look at this.

My recollection is that this was pretty tightly coupled to the wCTE
patch. I had been intending to review them together, and have just
now come up for air enough to start doing that. Do you really want
to review this one separately?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-23 22:40:00 Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-23 22:37:39 Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...