From: | Samuel Tardieu <sam(at)rfc1149(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Maintaining a counter up-to-date |
Date: | 2003-06-02 15:47:35 |
Message-ID: | 871xyc5vmw.fsf@inf.enst.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
I have an "ips" table with 100000+ records, each record having a
"catid" field representing its category. "catid" references a row in a
table called "categories".
For statistics purpose (generation of images with the evolution of the
number of rows by category), I am trying to reduce the load on the
database.
The request I was doing at the beginning was:
SELECT catid, COUNT(*) FROM ips GROUP BY catid;
I then added a "nentries" field to the "categories" table with some
rules to maintain the counters up-to-date:
CREATE RULE cat_ins AS
ON INSERT TO ips
DO
UPDATE categories
SET nentries = (categories.nentries + 1)
WHERE (categories.catid = new.catid);
CREATE RULE cat_del AS
ON DELETE TO ips
DO
UPDATE categories
SET nentries = (categories.nentries - 1)
WHERE (categories.catid = old.catid);
CREATE RULE cat_upd AS
ON UPDATE TO ips
WHERE old.catid <> new.catid
DO
(UPDATE categories
SET nentries = (categories.nentries - 1)
WHERE (categories.catid = old.catid);
UPDATE categories
SET nentries = (categories.nentries + 1)
WHERE (categories.catid = new.catid); );
This works fine when inserting, deleting or updating one row in the
"ips" table. However, when i/d/u several rows at a time with the same
"catid", I only got an increment or decrement by one of the counter.
I have not found an easy way to maintain the counter up-to-date.
I have found a complex solution: I created a "counter" table with two
fields, "catid" and "value". The idea is to put 1 in "value" for every
insertion or new value for update, or -1 for every deletion or old
value for update.
CREATE RULE counter_ins AS
ON INSERT TO ips
DO
(INSERT INTO counter (catid, value) VALUES (new.catid, 1);
UPDATE categories
SET nentries = nentries +
(SELECT sum(*) FROM counter
WHERE counter.catid = categories.catid)
WHERE (categories.catid = counter.catid);
DELETE FROM counter; );
(I do not show the equivalent "ON DELETE" and "ON UPDATE" rules)
I have two questions:
1) Is this way of doing things correct? Do I have the guarantee that
all the commands in the "DO" part will be executed in a
transaction even if the initial insertion into "ips" isn't?
2) What is the simplest way of doing this? I guess doing stats in a
database is quite a pretty usual operation.
Thanks in advance.
Sam
PS/ the real problem is more complex, as we need to do those
statistics on several fields, not only "catid"
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam(at)rfc1149(dot)net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2003-06-02 16:40:58 | Re: SQL problem: bank account |
Previous Message | Dmitry Tkach | 2003-06-02 14:31:33 | Re: Using & - operator |