From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-18 05:21:04 |
Message-ID: | 871xs68d6n.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> 1) PITR
> 2) Distributed Tx
> 3) Replication
> 4) Nested Tx
> 5) PL/SQL Exception Handling
Of these PITR seems *by far* the most important. It makes the difference
between an enterprise-class database capable of running 24x7 with disaster
recovery plans, and a lesser beast that needs to be shut down for cold backups
periodically.
Features like Nested Transactions and Exception Handling are "would be nice"
features. Especially for pre-existing code-bases. But for new projects they're
not things that make the difference between measuring up and not.
Besides, Oracle 8 had Replication the way Mysql has transactions... It a
recently bolted-on addition that only worked in limited cases until a few
rewrites later.
Oh, and yeah, a win32 port. Yay, another OS port. Postgres runs on dozens of
OSes already. What's so exciting about one more? Even if it is a
pathologically hard OS to port to. Just because it was hard doesn't mean it's
useful.
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-18 05:36:42 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2003-11-18 04:18:48 | Press coverage in Australia |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-18 05:36:42 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 04:41:48 | So as not to break it for anyone ... |