From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
Date: | 2007-04-29 15:50:24 |
Message-ID: | 871wi3yybj.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The postponed patches can be reviewed and committed early in 8.4, instead of
> at the last minute in 8.3.
Given that some of those patches have been in the queue since last September
is there any reason to think they'll get reviewed early in this cycle if they
weren't last cycle?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-29 16:00:40 | Re: Reducing stats collection overhead |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-29 15:47:58 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-04-29 15:55:18 | Developers Wiki Down ... |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-29 15:47:58 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |