From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade libraries check |
Date: | 2012-05-29 09:11:37 |
Message-ID: | 871um3uzau.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> is not going to happen. Putting shared libraries into a
> postgres-writable directory will be seen (correctly) as a security hole
> of the first magnitude, not to mention that in many systems it'd require
> root privilege anyway to adjust the dynamic linker's search path.
It seems I keep forgetting about security concerns. Thanks for the
heads-up, will try to think about something else then. Damn.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2012-05-29 09:28:12 | Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2012-05-29 08:06:19 | Re: Bogus nestloop rows estimate in 8.4.7 |