From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: select where not in () fails |
Date: | 2018-09-22 18:13:03 |
Message-ID: | 871s9lif94.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
>>>>> "Gary" == Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
Gary> As I said in my description, some values will be NULL. I just
Gary> thought that these would not be included in the select. I did not
Gary> think that it would stop the subselect from working
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Don%27t_Do_This#Don.27t_use_NOT_IN
Gary> users=# select count(u_id) from users where u_id not in (select
Gary> distinct emp_u_id from employees where emp_u_id is not null);
Never use DISTINCT inside IN; the IN already implies it.
Always rewrite NOT IN (select ...) to use NOT EXISTS instead, like so:
select count(u_id) from users u
where not exists (select 1 from employees e where u.u_id=e.emp_u_id);
(and always qualify every column reference in the query, especially when
using IN)
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ROS Didier | 2018-10-06 09:57:25 | Why the index is not used ? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-09-21 16:14:15 | Re: select where not in () fails |