| From: | Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Zhilin <m(dot)zhilin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal |
| Date: | 2024-05-22 02:47:43 |
| Message-ID: | 871q5uk19e.fsf@163.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
>> Andy Fan asked me off-list for some feedback about this proposal. I
>> have hesitated to comment on it for lack of having studied the matter
>> in any detail, but since I've been asked for my input, here goes:
>
> Thanks for doing this! Since we have two totally different designs
> between Tomas and me and I think we both understand the two sides of
> each design, just that the following things are really puzzled to me.
my emacs was stuck and somehow this incompleted message was sent out,
Please ignore this post for now. Sorry for this.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-05-22 03:05:20 | Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION" |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-05-22 02:47:39 | Re: Ambiguous description on new columns |