Re: when to use NULL and when to NOT NULL DEFAULT ''

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>
Cc: Miles Keaton <mileskeaton(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: when to use NULL and when to NOT NULL DEFAULT ''
Date: 2004-10-08 14:37:06
Message-ID: 870CA06E-1937-11D9-A09B-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Oct 8, 2004, at 11:11 PM, David Garamond wrote:

> The relationists' SQL replacement had better have more convenient JOIN
> syntax then. :-)

Personally I find the JOIN ... USING syntax quite convenient. More
robust domain support is another side to this issue.

Cheers,

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-08 15:05:16 Re: pg_restore -l and schema name
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-08 14:16:42 Re: text + text