| From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
|---|---|
| To: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Aliases for Field Names in SELECT statements |
| Date: | 2008-01-04 17:18:50 |
| Message-ID: | 86wsqp5x1h.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pdxpug |
>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> writes:
Rich> A thread on the postgres users mail list asks how to write a SELECT
Rich> statement using a column alias (e.g., SELECT emp_id AS e FROM employee),
Rich> and Bruce Momjian responded that it's not possible and on the To-Do list
Rich> to not be done.
Are you sure he wasn't talking about the fact that in the standard, aliases
apply *after* the WHERE, but *before* the HAVING, and therefore you can't ever
use aliases in the WHERE clause since they simply don't exist yet?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Randal L. Schwartz | 2008-01-04 17:24:30 | Re: Aliases for Field Names in SELECT statements |
| Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-01-04 16:55:50 | your Survey |