From: | Harald Fuchs <hari(dot)fuchs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New feature: accumulative functions. |
Date: | 2011-09-26 11:44:20 |
Message-ID: | 86sjnjplyj.fsf@protecting.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <CAFj8pRDx6JLmneV30kWNrcwzGLOSqyK-qN7T4_N37L9UPd2M=Q(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2011/9/25 pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> I found second use case. Look at expression:
>>
>> where left(str,n)='value'
>>
>> function left(str,n) increase monotonically for str and n. With this
>> feature it can use index on str.
>>
>> Classic index needs recreating.
>>
> these use cases are just theory - for example - this case should be
> solved with immutable functions
> I can use a functional index left(str, const) and use a query
> where left(str, const) = left('value', const) and left(str, n) = 'value'
> There are a theoretical cases, but these cases should be solved via
> special data type and GiST index
If I don't misunderstand you, this data type is called 'prefix_range',
available at PgFoundry.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2011-09-26 11:49:45 | Re: Sending Results From One Function As Input into Another Function |
Previous Message | Venkat Balaji | 2011-09-26 11:41:47 | : PostgreSQL Online Backup |