From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
---|---|
To: | "Chris Travers" <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Randolf Richardson" <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Date: | 2003-11-29 13:58:20 |
Message-ID: | 86llpzgttv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> writes:
Chris> The resulting situation is that MySQL has some licensing and
Chris> technical issues that make it a very bad fit for enterprise
Chris> use. PostgreSQL is both more free (in that closed source
Chris> programs can CONNECT to it) and technically ahead of MySQL. It
Chris> is also more rugged and performs better under real
Chris> circumstances. For this reason, I cannot think of a company
Chris> (aside from web hosting services) choosing MySQL over
Chris> PostgreSQL.
The biggest advantage MySQL still has over PostgreSQL is the same
advantage Microsoft has over Unix - entrenchment, both in
software and mindshare.
The marketplace often does the right thing, but when one "was right"
thing dominates the market, the "new right" thing rarely has an easy
time.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-11-29 14:04:06 | Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments |
Previous Message | Randal L. Schwartz | 2003-11-29 13:54:46 | Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments |