| From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: To Postgres or not |
| Date: | 2005-07-14 07:49:36 |
| Message-ID: | 86k6jtj08f.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
Neil> Does MySQL with InnoDB not qualify as an ACID-compliant database?
Not when you can store a value that is larger than allowed, and it
is silently truncated to be within range. no *I* integrity there.
That's regardless of InnoDB or not.
MySQL is a toy compared to PostgreSQL.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory S. Williamson | 2005-07-14 07:50:54 | Re: Quotation marks in queries |
| Previous Message | Martynas Brijunas | 2005-07-14 07:31:33 | Quotation marks in queries |