| From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Moore-Oliva <josh(at)chatgris(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: constant scalar subselect no longer equivalent to constant? |
| Date: | 2003-03-14 16:01:39 |
| Message-ID: | 86fzpqrl7g.fsf@red.stonehenge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua Moore-Oliva <josh(at)chatgris(dot)com> writes:
Joshua> The fast that constant timestamp works seems to further prove
Joshua> my theory since then you have timestamp without time zone.
Joshua> I'd be interested to know if this is the solution :)
I misspoke if that was implied. It is indeed "timestamp with timestone".
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-14 16:22:28 | Re: constant scalar subselect no longer equivalent to constant? |
| Previous Message | Randal L. Schwartz | 2003-03-14 15:57:52 | Re: constant scalar subselect no longer equivalent to constant? |