From: | Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO> |
---|---|
To: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Its not my fault. Its SEG's FAULT! |
Date: | 1998-04-02 18:01:30 |
Message-ID: | 86emzggl1h.fsf@barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould) writes:
> I would like to discuss the idea of replacing the current scheme of
> explicit memory allocation and and deallocation from separate
> "MemoryDuration" pools with a conservative garbage collector.
Yes! This is a great idea! [scrambles, grinning, to finally get to
work on porting the Boehm-Weiser collector properly to NetBSD/* 1.3]
It seems, from recent discussion, reasonable to assume that this will
kill a number of bugs, reduce the memory footprint of the backend and
quite possibly even (judging by the profiling data you quote) give a
welcome performance boost. Will you be doing some trial runs with
Boehm-Weiser simply linked in as a malloc/free replacement? Is it a
big project to actually rip out the MemoryDuration allocator's guts to
get rid of some of that overhead?
> I know which one I would rather write! And it is fairly obvious
> which one is more likely to work.
Of course, this one [he said, grinning]:
(define (do-thing)
(with-handler my-handler
(do-the-wild-thing)))
> Unsupported assertions to the effect "GC is too slow ... only works
> with lisp ..." etc are ok too, but will be eligible to win valuable
> prizes.
...like a guide to documents on the net debunking these and other
favorite misconceptions about garbage collection? You're hardly
likely to get too many of those assertions, though: by now, I would
assume that it's gotten through to most programmers that the handling
of memory in a large system can be done more reliably _and_ more
efficiently by a good garbage collector than by a C programmer. The
fact that the Java designers got this right (no surprise, of course,
with Steele at the core), should by itself have convinced many.
Off-topic: as for Java, we now just have to wait for the byte-code
engine and entire run-time support system to be rewritten in Java, so
that we can get a stable deployment platform for Java on the web that
won't crash the user's browser every other time she loads an applet!
-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-04-03 05:17:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Its not my fault. Its SEG's FAULT! |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-02 17:43:51 | Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: memory leak in postgres backend processes |