Re: Restart replicated slave procedure

From: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: Joseph Kregloh <jkregloh(at)sproutloud(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Restart replicated slave procedure
Date: 2014-08-22 18:21:45
Message-ID: 86egw8fkqu.fsf@jerry.enova.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Joseph Kregloh <jkregloh(at)sproutloud(dot)com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Currently I am doing asynchronous replication from master to
> slave. Now if I restart the slave it will fall out of sync with the
> master. Is there a correct procedure or set of steps to avoid this? I
> am looking for best practices or suggestions. Whenever my slave fell
> out of sync I would either issue a new pg_base_backup() or set the
> master to pg_start_backup() do an rsync and stop using
> pg_stop_backup(). If there is a way to avoid any of that, for example
> pause replication to hold all the wal files until the replicated slave
> comes back and then release them once the replicated slave is up.
>
> I apologize if this question has already been asked. I did some searching beforehand.

See the manual and read up on the 2 GUCs; archive_command and wal_keep_segments.

wal_keep_segments lets you hold a configurable number of WAL segments
back and buy some more time till you have to resync the stand bys.

Setting archive_command to '' or something like '/bin/false' lets you
delay archiving forever till you change them back again and/or fill
whatever file system pg_xlog writes to :-)

>
> Thanks,
> -Joseph Kregloh
>

--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 312.241.7800

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2014-08-22 18:33:20 Re: deadlock in single-row select-for-update + update scenario? How could it happen?
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2014-08-22 18:14:58 Re: deadlock in single-row select-for-update + update scenario? How could it happen?