RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)

> > --------
> > static Query *
> > rewriteRuleAction(Query *parsetree,
> > ...
> > if (sub_action_ptr)
> > + {
> > *sub_action_ptr = sub_action;
> > + rule_action->hasModifyingCTE |=
> parsetree->hasModifyingCTE;
> > + }
> > --------
> >
> > And the Basic test passed.
> > What do you think ?
>
> That is very close to what I was going to suggest, which is this:
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
> b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
> index 0672f497c6..3c4417af98 100644
> --- a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
> +++ b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
> @@ -631,6 +631,8 @@ rewriteRuleAction(Query *parsetree,
> checkExprHasSubLink((Node *)
> rule_action->returningList);
> }
>
> + rule_action->hasModifyingCTE |= parsetree->hasModifyingCTE;
> +
> return rule_action;
> }

if (parsetree->cteList != NIL && sub_action->commandType != CMD_UTILITY)
{
...
sub_action->cteList = list_concat(sub_action->cteList,
}

Is is possible when sub_action is CMD_UTILITY ?
In this case CTE will be copied to the newone, should we set the set the flag in this case ?

Best regard,
houzj