Re: Physical sites handling large data

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Physical sites handling large data
Date: 2002-09-16 19:33:29
Message-ID: 86ccougibj0bvmrhtkt1fsfql0aa9143cv@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 15 Sep 2002 11:33:59 -0400, Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> wrote:
> shared memory to 3.2Gigs (out of 6GB Ram). [...]
>shared_buffers = 38500
>
>ipcs output:
>0x0052e2c1 98304 postgres 600 324018176 51

Ericson, this looks more like 300MB to me; which might be a good
choice anyway ;-)

Servus
Manfred

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2002-09-16 19:45:46 Re: find overlapping address ranges
Previous Message Robert Treat 2002-09-16 19:29:36 Re: cannot drop/create sequence

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2002-09-16 20:42:06 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-09-16 18:11:26 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?