Re: Remove HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Date: 2019-11-07 12:31:31
Message-ID: 86b5a77b-ef59-67e2-5b35-3979db2e511c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-10-30 14:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT is now implied by the requirement for C99, so the
> separate Autoconf check can be removed. The uses are almost all in ecpg
> code, and AFAICT the check was originally added specifically for ecpg.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grigory Smolkin 2019-11-07 13:36:09 Re: [proposal] recovery_target "latest"
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-11-07 12:29:36 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables