From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-30 15:55:24 |
Message-ID: | 86A81747-DCDC-4A8C-9CAE-10E5D1E54647@blighty.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sep 29, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Saturday, September 29, 2007 20:04:02 -0400 Jan Wieck
> <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just because you cannot imagine that correcting someone can be
>> done in a
>> polite way doesn't mean that insisting on Postgre not being an
>> accepted alias
>> is necessarily rude and ignorant by definition.
>
> Sorry, that wasn't what I was implying ... one impression I've
> gotten from all
> of these threads is that there have been people 'jumping down the
> throats' of
> ppl using either Postgres or Postgre ... not ppl 'politely
> correcting', but
> people being overtly rude ...
If someone has a problem and they come to the pg community for help
and the very first thing they get in response to their plea for help is
a "polite correction", that is also rude and unhelpful. If it's the only
answer they get it's even worse.
It doesn't need to be intentionally rude to be rude.
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-09-30 17:50:27 | Re: COSSFEST event in Calgary |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-09-30 02:14:38 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |