| From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
| Date: | 2007-09-30 15:55:24 |
| Message-ID: | 86A81747-DCDC-4A8C-9CAE-10E5D1E54647@blighty.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sep 29, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Saturday, September 29, 2007 20:04:02 -0400 Jan Wieck
> <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just because you cannot imagine that correcting someone can be
>> done in a
>> polite way doesn't mean that insisting on Postgre not being an
>> accepted alias
>> is necessarily rude and ignorant by definition.
>
> Sorry, that wasn't what I was implying ... one impression I've
> gotten from all
> of these threads is that there have been people 'jumping down the
> throats' of
> ppl using either Postgres or Postgre ... not ppl 'politely
> correcting', but
> people being overtly rude ...
If someone has a problem and they come to the pg community for help
and the very first thing they get in response to their plea for help is
a "polite correction", that is also rude and unhelpful. If it's the only
answer they get it's even worse.
It doesn't need to be intentionally rude to be rude.
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-09-30 17:50:27 | Re: COSSFEST event in Calgary |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-09-30 02:14:38 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |