| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres |
| Date: | 2020-12-02 22:08:41 |
| Message-ID: | 869172f6-9114-e759-79ba-eb17f1c5082c@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/2/20 2:02 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> guyren(at)icloud(dot)com schrieb am 02.12.2020 um 21:27:
>> The Halloween problem is that it is a challenge for the database if
>> you’re updating a field that is also in the WHERE clause of the same
>> query.
>>
>> I just saw a presentation from someone about how in SQL Server he
>> recommended writing changes to a temp table and then writing them to
>> the table as being much more efficient.
>
> It sounds strange to me, that this _is_ actually a problem.
>
> Why exactly is that a problem in SQL Server?
Yeah that was a new one to me. A quick search found:
https://www.sqlshack.com/the-halloween-problem-in-sql-server-and-suggested-solutions/
> And what are the consequences if you do it nevertheless.
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | raf | 2020-12-02 22:11:36 | Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2020-12-02 22:02:07 | Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres |