From: "Orhan Aglagul" <oaglagul(at)cittio(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Date: 2007-05-08 22:59:13
Message-ID: 868BCE5A6576F44A862F1FBBC3E14A01042559C3@ms17.mse9.exchange.ms
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Everybody,

I was trying to see how many inserts per seconds my application could
handle on various machines.

Those are the machines I used to run my app:

1) Pentium M 1.7Ghz

2) Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz

3) DMP Xeon 3Ghz

Sure, I was expecting the dual Zeon to outperform the Pentium M and 4.
But the data showed the opposite.

So, I wrote a simple program (in C) using the libpq.so.5 which opens a
connection to the database (DB in localhost),

Creates a Prepared statement for the insert and does a 10,000 insert.
The result did not change.

Only after setting fsync to off in the config file, the amount of time
to insert 10,000 records was acceptable.

Here is the data:

Time for 10000 inserts

Fsync=on

Fsync=off

Pentium M 1.7

~17 sec

~6 sec

Pentium 4 2.4

~13 sec

~11 sec

Dual Xeon

~65 sec

~1.9 sec

I read that postgres does have issues with MP Xeon (costly context
switching). But I still think that with fsync=on 65 seconds is
ridiculous.

Can anybody direct me to some improved/acceptable performance with
fsync=on?

Thx,

Orhan a.

Responses

  • Re: at 2007-05-08 23:48:59 from Dan Harris
  • Re: at 2007-05-09 00:22:45 from Scott Marlowe
  • Re: at 2007-05-09 00:30:42 from Scott Marlowe
  • Re: at 2007-05-09 04:14:42 from Greg Smith

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Griscom 2007-05-08 23:03:17 Re: Throttling PostgreSQL's CPU usage
Previous Message Carlos Moreno 2007-05-08 22:46:42 Re: Throttling PostgreSQL's CPU usage