Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner'
> concept on lobs at all. So is there no problem with any random gumby
> commenting on anyone else's large object?
We don't have a lot of choice. I suppose ideally LOs should have
owners, but I don't really want to put that much effort (and breakage of
existing apps, no doubt) into them.
regards, tom lane