From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Code checks for App Devs, using new options for transaction behavior |
Date: | 2022-10-28 06:54:29 |
Message-ID: | 867c9a53-ef29-07ed-7802-c6a9e0a83f55@xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Op 27-10-2022 om 18:35 schreef Simon Riggs:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:09, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Comments please
>
> Update from patch tester results.
>
> [001_psql_parse_only.v1.patch ]
> [002_nested_xacts.v7.patch ]
> [003_rollback_on_commit.v1.patch ]
> [004_add_params_to_sample.v1.patch]
patch 002 has (2x) :
'transction' should be
'transaction'
also in patch 002:
'at any level will be abort' should be
'at any level will abort'
I also dislike the 'we' in
'Once we reach the top-level transaction,'
That seems a bit too much like the 'we developers working together to
make a database server system' which is of course used often and
usefully on this mailinglist and in code itself. But I think
user-facing docs should be careful with that team-building 'we'. I
remember well how it confused me, many years ago. Better, IMHO:
'Once the top-level transaction is reached,'
Thanks,
Erik Rijkers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-28 07:05:12 | Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-10-28 06:52:51 | psql: Add command to use extended query protocol |