| From: | "Paul S" <plabrh1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation |
| Date: | 2006-07-26 21:58:57 |
| Message-ID: | 866624ef0607261458w93aa077nab31e085859d0def@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yeah, your probably right. :)
On 7/26/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Paul Silveira <plabrh1(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > If I didn't know anything about PostgreSQL and read a manual about it's
> > indexing capabilities and read that it had ONLINE reindexing, the first
> > thing that I would think about was the ability to rebuild my indexes
> without
> > causing any blocking or writers or readers.
>
> Only because you're already familiar with Oracle --- it will not convey
> such a meaning to people who don't know that product.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-26 22:21:44 | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-26 21:43:05 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to |