Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-01-21 21:22:05
Message-ID: 864ab4fb-be20-c086-6f52-f87701d655e4@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 1/21/22 13:58, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:42 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks. I added that and pushed. Let's see if fairywren likes it
>> when it comes back online.
> A watched pot never boils, but I wonder why Andrew's 4 Windows
> configurations jacana, bowerbird, fairywren and drongo have stopped
> returning results.

I think I have unstuck both machines. I will keep an eye on them and
make sure they don't get stuck again.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-01-21 21:34:52 Re: Document atthasmissing default optimization avoids verification table scan
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-01-21 21:08:35 Re: Document atthasmissing default optimization avoids verification table scan