Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date: 2021-04-16 22:47:04
Message-ID: 86461.1618613224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'll look into the details some more on Monday.

Fair enough.

Although there are only a few buildfarm members complaining, I don't
really want to leave them red all weekend. I could either commit the
patch I just presented, or revert ef387bed8 ... got a preference?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-04-16 23:05:06 Re: Iterating on IndexTuple attributes and nbtree page-level dynamic prefix truncation
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-04-16 22:01:53 Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies