Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch

From: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Date: 2008-09-16 22:23:38
Message-ID: 863A4F07-50F8-43AA-95C4-CA78836E36D1@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I had either on that a while back. I think the existing tuplestore can
be made to work without bad performance penaltiesbin the usual case.
The trick was to do it without making the code unreadable.

I can send the code I had but I doubt you want to use it as-is.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-16 22:36:27 Re: Patch for SQL-standard negative valued year-month literals
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2008-09-16 22:20:02 Re: Patch for SQL-standard negative valued year-month literals