| From: | Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | nha <lyondif02(at)free(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Group by on %like% |
| Date: | 2009-07-04 09:44:17 |
| Message-ID: | 863606ec0907040244y7084be07j934b2b5644f0978a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
Sorry for taking so long to respond. The prefix thingy is definetly
attractive for future development and I had already discovered them to be a
challenge. However, i have noticed all kinds of ways people tend to write
their number, including omitting the + or 00 .. so at this time, for this
task, I found Guys to be working pretty well.
Thanks all / Jen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-07-04 13:06:54 | Re: REINDEX "is not a btree" |
| Previous Message | dfx@dfx.it | 2009-07-04 08:51:30 | Start automatically a function at startup of postgresql server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-04 10:27:11 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-07-04 04:50:03 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |