From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Date: | 2025-02-17 19:13:09 |
Message-ID: | 861660.1739819589@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Monday, February 17, 2025, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> You'd really have to take that up with the author of pg_prewarm.
> This is our contrib module so this seems like the expected place to ask
> such a question. It’s neither a bug nor a topic for -hackers. FTR, Robert
> Haas is the author from 2013. Not sure he monitors -general though.
Ah, you are right, I was thinking it was a third-party extension.
If we're talking about changing the behavior of a contrib module,
I think -hackers would be the appropriate location for that.
And it does seem like this deserves a fresh look. As it stands,
a superuser can prewarm an index (because she bypasses all
privilege checks including this one), but nobody else can.
Seems weird.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ayush Vatsa | 2025-02-17 19:42:44 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-02-17 18:43:04 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergey Belyashov | 2025-02-17 19:17:05 | Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-02-17 19:03:39 | Re: New buildfarm animals with FIPS mode enabled |