From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: generate syscache info automatically |
Date: | 2024-01-19 14:03:37 |
Message-ID: | 861507e0-6106-40ce-948d-c104d2d9df21@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19.01.24 06:28, John Naylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:46 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> I updated the patch to use this style (but I swapped the first two
>> arguments from my example, so that the thing being created is named first).
>>
>> I also changed the names of the output files a bit to make them less
>> confusing. (I initially had some files named .c.h, which was weird, but
>> apparently necessary to avoid confusing the build system. But it's all
>> clearer now.)
>>
>> Other than bugs and perhaps style opinions, I think the first patch is
>> pretty good now.
>
> LGTM. The only style consideration that occurred to me just now was
> MAKE_SYSCACHE, since it doesn't match the DECLARE_... macros. It seems
> like the same thing from a code generation perspective. The other
> macros refer to relations, so there is a difference, but maybe it
> doesn't matter. I don't have a strong opinion.
The DECLARE_* macros map to actual BKI commands ("declare toast",
"declare index"). So I wanted to use a different verb to distinguish
"generate code for this" from those BKI commands.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Banck | 2024-01-19 14:08:36 | Re: [PATCH] Exponential backoff for auth_delay |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-01-19 14:00:40 | Re: Build versionless .so for Android |