| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: numeric test on RiscPC |
| Date: | 2002-04-09 19:37:23 |
| Message-ID: | 8600.1018381043@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:18:23AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like Acorn's shell has the same bug documented to exist in HPUX's
>> shell (see doc/FAQ_HPUX :-() ... it gets confused when it has to manage
>> more than about a dozen child processes.
> it gets as far as create_function_2. Hunting will be interesting: the only
> architecture dependent thing I can see in sh is:
I doubt it's architectural at all ... try looking for fixed-size
arrays...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Johann Zuschlag | 2002-04-09 19:40:33 | Doc error? was: Why does this not work? (keyword 'TEXT') |
| Previous Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2002-04-09 19:26:38 | Re: more about pg_toast growth |