Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Andrus <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows
Date: 2020-03-30 19:12:21
Message-ID: 85fdd6f1-a23f-167a-e712-18c4a3166da8@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/30/20 11:36 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 3/30/20 11:06 AM, Andrus wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Got it. Just thought it would be easier not to have to deal with
>>> cross OS issues.
>>> Here is one example:
>>> https://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/en/html/example-watchdog.html
>>
>> Hopefully Windows Hyper-V virtual network adapter will not check
>> windows 20 connection limit.
>> In this case using Debian+Hyper-V+ binary replication allows to
>> connect more than 20 users and may be best solution.
>
> That is something I would verify. It would surprise me if MS would allow
> you to turn a desktop OS(Windows 10) into a server OS.
>
>>
>> Both have 64-bit OS. Will binary replication work in this case.
>
> Take a look at:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/warm-standby.html#STANDBY-PLANNING
>
> It is not specifically ruled out, nor is it is explicitly ruled in.
> Myself, I would not bet on it being stable.

Clarification. The above was based on running Postgres under Windows
itself. My mind had not updated to the Postgres on Debian in Hyper-V
plan. In that case I would not see an issue.

>
>>
>> Andrus.
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Seiler 2020-03-30 20:36:16 Re: Mixed Locales and Upgrading
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2020-03-30 18:36:59 Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows