Re: sync_standbys_defined read/write race on startup

From: "Maksim(dot)Melnikov" <m(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sync_standbys_defined read/write race on startup
Date: 2025-04-10 09:55:54
Message-ID: 85d3dfb9-8735-4ea3-be01-888c1a33401f@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10.04.2025 12:15, Michael Paquier wrote:

> Hmm, yeah. Instead of last, it would be better to put it in second
> place perhaps, for clarity? That would be the same at the end, but we
> would be slightly more consistent with the past logic regarding the
> ordering. Does that look OK to you?

Yes, from my point of view it looks fine.

Best regards,
Maksim Melnikov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2025-04-10 10:36:14 Re: Memoize ANTI and SEMI JOIN inner
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2025-04-10 09:52:14 Correct documentation for protocol version