| From: | SQL Padawan <sql_padawan(at)protonmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres-XL |
| Date: | 2021-11-27 17:39:12 |
| Message-ID: | 85RGbgzOr-M5AWyHpnx6XqpZa5MELRdlfvtDO2VQ648MvsE0NPJ8UGtMKwBmOQ5OdnRa391MYlrmTkEmWIkvY-jY7qDdGsh2FPzI781YE1Y=@protonmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Saturday, November 27th, 2021 at 17:12, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
> Στις 27/11/21 7:01 μ.μ., ο/η SQL Padawan έγραψε:
> > > Postgres-XL is not exactly a replication solution but it is ACID compliant and it doesn't have problem with sequences. It is a decent high availability solution. More information is available here: https://www.postgres-xl.org/
> > >
> > > It hasn't moved in almost 3 years? A Marie-Céleste project?
> You know that "free" in software is one thing and "free" beer another.
Yes of course - and I'm not criticising or pointing fingers at anyone involved in that project.
It's just that it has been **my experience** that software always has issues - esp. a piece of distributed software whose foundation is also v. complex.
PostgreSQL 10 is at version 19 - the XL project hasn't moved since 10.1 - doesn't inspire confidence in me anyway - and I personally would be very hesitant about recommending what is, AFAICS, abandon-ware.
YMMV - with all respect,
SQLP!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaurav Anand | 2021-11-29 06:45:00 | PGXN installation failure for Postgres Image of PostgreSQL 12 and 13 versions. |
| Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2021-11-27 17:12:52 | Re: Postgres-XL |